Publications About Research

This page contains details of publications about the research process and how to assess the evidence.

For details of publications which are specifically about research into autism, please see autism research publications.

If you know of any other publications we should list on this page please email info@informationautism.org

Please note that we are unable to supply publications unless we are listed as the publisher. However, if you are a UK resident you may be able to obtain them from your local public library, your college library or direct from the publisher.

Related Publications

• Auckland S. Involving users in the research process: A how to guide for researchers. London: National Institute for Health Research Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Boutron I. et al. (2017) CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. Annals of Internal Medicine. 167(1), Read Abstract (New Window)
  
  
• British Psychological Society (2018) Conducting research with people not having the capacity to consent to their participation: A practical guide for researchers. London: British Psychological Society Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 Ottawa, ON: CONSORT Group Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009) Systematic reviews: CRD guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Goldacre B. (2009) Bad science. London: Harper Perennial
  
  
• GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 328 Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Greenhalgh T. (2014) How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine. London: Wiley Blackwell
  
  
• Higgins J. P., Green S. (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. Cochrane Collaboration Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• INVOLVE (2012) Public involvement in clinical trials: Supplement to the briefing notes for researchers. Eastleigh, Hants: INVOLVE Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• INVOLVE (2012) Public involvement in systematic reviews: Supplement to the briefing notes for researchers. Eastleigh, Hants: INVOLVE Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Kratochwill T. R. et al. (2010) Single-case designs technical documentation. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Moher D. et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS. Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• O’Brien B. C. et al. (2014) Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine. 89(9), Read Abstract (New Window) Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Puttick R. (2014) Mapping the standards of evidence used in UK social policy. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Tate R. L., Perdices M., Rosenkoetter U. (2016) The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 96(7), Read Abstract (New Window) Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 19(6), Read Full (New Window)
  
  
• Sampson M., Vohra S., Shamseer L. . (2015) CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement. BMJ. 345 Read Full (New Window)
  
  

---

Quick link:

https://www.informationautism.org/publications-about-research

Updated

03 May 2022