logo

Equine-Assisted Activities and Therapies and Autism Ranking: Limited positive evidence

Autistic child riding a horse with instructor

Equine-assisted activities and therapies (EAAT) is a term used to describe any kind of intervention based around the use of horses and/or the horses' environment.  

Equine-assisted activities include a wide range of horse-related activities (such as therapeutic horseback riding, interactive vaulting, and therapeutic carriage driving, as well as grooming and stable management).

Equine-assisted therapies include hippotherapy (use of a horse to improve neurological function and sensory processing) and equine-assisted psychotherapy (use of a horse to improve mental health).

Some people believe that EEAT can help autistic people cope better with a wide range of problems. For example, they believe that therapeutic horseback riding can help with issues such as social and communication difficulties, hyperactivity and irritability. They also believe that hippotherapy can help with issues such as posture, adaptive behaviours, and self-care.

Our Opinion

There is a reasonable amount of research evidence (10 group studies and eight single-case design studies with three or more participants) into the use of equine-assisted activities and therapies for autistic individuals.

This research suggests that therapeutic horseback riding may provide some benefits to some autistic children and young people.  Those benefits include increased social communication and interaction, alongside increased concentration and decreased hyperactivity and irritability. 

There is insufficient evidence to determine if therapeutic horseback riding provides any benefits to autistic adults.

There is insufficient evidence to determine if hippotherapy provides any benefits to autistic individuals.

There is no research to suggest other forms of equine-assisted activities and therapies, such as equine-assisted psychotherapy, provide any benefits to autistic individuals.

There is a need for more research into equine-assisted activities and therapies which uses scientifically robust, experimental methodologies with larger numbers of more diverse participants.  That research should investigate whether equine-assisted activities and therapies are more or less effective than other interventions designed to provide the same benefits, and whether specific individuals are more likely to benefit from specific forms of EEAT than other individuals.

Disclaimer

Please read our Disclaimer on Autism Interventions

Audience

EAAT are used with a wide range of people, including people with cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury, Down syndrome and so on. 

The Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International states that autistic children and adults can participate in a variety of EAAT including riding, driving, vaulting, hippotherapy, and equine-facilitated psychotherapy (EFP).  

Some organisations, such as the Three Gaits, Inc. Therapeutic Horsemanship Center, recommend that EAAT is not used for children under the age of two. This is because their neurological systems are not mature enough to deal with the sensory input which is produced by sitting astride a moving horse and because they may lack the neck control necessary to hold up the head with the additional weight of a helmet when on a moving horse.

Aims and Claims

Aims

All equine-assisted activities and therapies are designed to achieve some kind of therapeutic benefit (beyond the sheer pleasure of being on or around the horse).

Therapeutic horseback riding is primarily designed to improve physical, psychological, cognitive, and social skills, as well as to improve horsemanship skills.  It is used with a wide variety of people with a range of different conditions.

Hippotherapy is primarily designed to improve neurological function and sensory processing.  It is often used with people who have neurological or sensory processing difficulties, such as people with cerebral palsy or brain injury. 

Equine-facilitated psychotherapy is primarily designed to help personal exploration (for example, awareness of thoughts, emotions, and behaviours) through interactions with the horse.  It is often used with people with emotional, behavioural or mental health problems.


Claims

There have been various claims made for EAAT.  For example, the Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International claims that

“Both equine-assisted activities such as riding or vaulting and equine-assisted therapy such as hippotherapy or psychotherapy can impact the life of a person with autism.” 

There have been a number of studies which claim that therapeutic horseback riding can help some autistic individuals.  For example, Gabriels (2012) reported

“Specifically, participants in the THR intervention group made significant improvements from baseline to post-evaluations on measures of self-regulation (Irritability, Lethargy, Stereotypic Behavior, and Hyperactivity), adaptive expressive language skills, motor skills, and verbal praxis/motor planning skills.”

There have been a few studies which claim that hippotherapy can help some autistic individuals.  For example, Ajzenman et al (2013) reported

“Postural sway significantly decreased postintervention. Significant increases were observed in overall adaptive behaviors (receptive communication and coping) and in participation in self-care, low-demand leisure, and social interactions.”

We have been unable to identify any claims for the use of equine-facilitated psychotherapy as a treatment for autistic individuals.

Key Features

Equine-assisted activities and therapies (EAAT) is a term used to describe any kind of intervention based around the use of horses and/or the horses' environment.

Therapeutic horseback riding

Therapeutic horseback riding is an intervention in which a therapeutic team (consisting of a certified therapeutic riding instructor, two or more volunteers and a horse) teach a client how to ride and how to look after a horse.
 
Each session usually follows the same pattern: mounting the horse, warm up, review of skills from the previous week, teaching a new skill, a game or activity to practice the new skill, a lesson review followed by a cool down period and dismount. After riding, participants may lead their horse to the tacking area, learn skills of un-tacking and grooming, thank their horse and volunteers, and put their equipment away.

Hippotherapy

Hippotherapy is an intervention in which a single therapist (an occupational therapist, a physiotherapist, or a speech and language therapist) works with a single client and a horse.
 
The therapist places the client on the horse; directs the movement of the horse; analyzes the rider's responses; and adjusts the treatment accordingly. Various movement challenges are presented by encouraging different movements of the horse to promote different postural responses of the rider in different positions. The horse influences the rider rather than the rider controlling the horse.

Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy

Equine-assisted psychotherapy is an intervention in which one or more mental health professionals works with one or more clients and one or more horses to achieve specific psychological goals.
 
Equine-assisted psychotherapy is experiential in nature. This means that the clients learn about themselves and others by participating in activities with the horses, and then processing (or discussing) feelings, behaviours, and patterns.
 
The activities may include selecting a horse, grooming and feeding it. It may not necessarily mean riding the horse.

Other Forms of EAAT

There are many other specific forms of EAAT including interactive vaulting (an activity in which the participants perform movements on and around the horse) and therapeutic carriage driving (controlling a horse while driving from a carriage seat or from a wheelchair in a carriage modified to accommodate the wheelchair).

Cost and Time

Cost

The cost of using EAAT will depend on a number of factors including the supplier, the type of EAAT being provided, the length and frequency of treatment and the needs of the individual participant.  There may also be additional costs for the initial evaluation, travel and equipment.

Some providers will charge per session, others will charge by the month and others will charge for a full course of treatment.  For example, when we did an online search on 1 June 2018 we found suppliers charging between £45 and £75 per hour for a single session, although the costs were less if you booked multiple sessions at the same time.  It is sometimes possible to get therapeutic riding for free via voluntary bodies such as Riding for the Disabled.

Time

The length and frequency of EAAT may vary depending on the specific form of EATT, the particular programme being followed, and the needs of the individual client. For example, an individual therapeutic horseback riding programme may run over several weeks (anything between 6-30 weeks) and include one or two sessions a week, each session lasting between 45-60 minutes.   Those sessions may be split between preparation work, work on the horse, and then further activity afterwards.

Parents are not normally directly involved in most forms of EAAT but they may have to spend time driving their children to and from the facility and waiting for them while they undertake the EAAT.

Risks and Safety

Hazards

Potential hazards are similar to those of other therapies involving the use of animals.  In this instance the dangers are magnified by the size of the animal, the risks of serious injury in the event of a fall or if the horse steps on a child.

Contraindications

Some organisations, such as the Three Gaits, Inc. Therapeutic Horsemanship Center, recommend that EAAT is not used for children under the age of two. This is because their neurological systems are not mature enough to deal with the sensory input which is produced by sitting astride a moving horse and because they may lack the neck control necessary to hold up the head with the additional weight of a helmet when on a moving horse.

They also suggest that EAAT may not be appropriate for some people with specific conditions such as

  • orthopedic  conditions, such as cranial deficits, joint subluxation/dislocation, and spinal instability/abnormalities
  • neurologic conditions such as hydrocephalus/shunt, seizures, spina bifida
  • some medical or psychological conditions such as  allergies, heart conditions, hemophilia

If in doubt, you should consult your doctor and/or therapist.

Notes

Cranial deficits (deficits in the brain cavity); hemophilia (condition characterised by inability to make blood clots); hydrocephalus (excessive fluid in the brain); shunt (hole or a small passage which moves, or allows movement of, fluid from one part of the body to another); seizures, spina bifida (condition characterised by incomplete closing of the backbone and membranes around the spinal cord); subluxation (dislocation).

Suppliers and Availability

Suppliers 

There are a number of EAAT providers in the UK, the USA and other countries.

Riding for the Disabled provides information about riding centres in the UK.

The Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International provides information about riding centres in the USA.

Credentials

There are some nationally recognised qualifications for providers of EAAT.  For example:

In the UK, the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Therapeutic Riding runs a one year course for chartered physiotherapists who wish to deliver hippotherapy and/or therapeutic horseback riding.  In practice, some providers of EAAT (such as some physiotherapists) may be regulated by other bodies, such as the Health and Care Professions Council.

In the USA, hippotherapy sessions must be conducted by a licensed occupational, physical or speech therapist or therapy assistant with additional specialised training in using the movement of the horse.  The therapist should be a registered NARAH Therapist or a Hippotherapy Clinical Specialist (HPCS). If the therapist does not have such credentials he must be supervised by an HPCS therapist.

Related Suppliers and Availability


History

Derived from the Greek hippos (horse), "hippotherapy" literally refers to treatment or therapy aided by a horse with the earliest recorded mention in the writings of Hippocrates. 

In the UK Agnes Hunt began using therapeutic horseback riding at the Orthopaedic Hospital in Oswestry in 1901.  Olive Sands took her horses to the Oxford Hospital to provide riding for the rehabilitation of soldiers wounded in the trenches during the First World War.  In 1952 Lis Hartel, a Danish wheelchair user, won Olympic medals with her horse.

In the USA, the North American Riding for the Handicapped Association was established in 1969 and is now known as the Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International. It promotes safety and optimal outcomes in equine-assisted activities and therapies for individuals with special needs.  The American Hippotherapy Association (AHA) was established in 1992 and does something very similar.

In the UK, the Riding for the Disabled Association was set up in 1969. It now acts as the unifying voice of a number of smaller groups offering various forms of EAAT.

The Federation of Horses in Education and Therapy International was set up in 1974.  It was created to provide a means of sharing and enhancing technical and educational expertise at the international level in the field of therapeutic riding.

Current Research

Description of Studies

We have identified 18 articles* published in English-language, peer-reviewed journals which evaluate the efficacy of equine-assisted activities and therapies as an intervention for autistic people.  Two of those articles (Gabriels et al, 2015; Petty et al, 2017) appear to describe the same study.

The studies we identified included more than 400 autistic individuals aged from three to 16, although 126 of these individuals were from the same study (Gabriels et al, 2015). Some of these individuals had specific diagnoses, such as autistic disorder or Asperger syndrome. Some of the individuals were described by the researchers as having mild, moderate or severe autism. Some of the individuals were described by the researchers as having an average IQ and having some verbal abilities. Some of the others were described by the researchers as having a below-average IQ and/or very limited verbal skills. 

The length of intervention varied between one month and six months, although in most cases the intervention lasted between two to three months.  In one case the intervention lasted for three hours each week but, in most cases, the intervention lasted between 30 and 60 minutes each week, 

The majority of the studies looked at therapeutic horseback riding while three studies (Ajzenman et al, 2013; Steiner and Kertesz, 2015; Taylor et al, 2009) looked at hippotherapy.  We have been unable to identify any studies of equine-assisted psychotherapy or other forms of EAAT.

The majority of the studies took place in equestrian centres, were run by professional instructors and followed protocols established by organisations such as The Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International. In most cases this meant that the sessions were overseen by a qualified instructor, with each participant being taught alongside one or two other children, each of whom was helped by two or three adult helpers while they were on the horse.

Nine of the studies used a group design, usually comparing a group of people receiving EAAT to a different group receiving something else or not receiving an intervention at all. Eight of the studies used a single-case design (where there was no group receiving something else).  

One of the studies (Petty et al, 2017) was a questionnaire survey which looked at whether the participants in another study (Gabriels et al, 2015) were more likely to take more care of their own pets at home after undertaking therapeutic horseback riding.

Some of the participants in some of the studies were receiving one or more other interventions (such as speech and language therapy or medication) at the same time as they received the EAAT.
                                
*Please note: We have not included articles with less than three autistic participants, articles which did not examine the efficacy of equine-assisted activities and therapies as an intervention for autistic people, or articles which did not include real horses.

Outcomes of Studies

The overwhelming majority of the studies reported positive results. One study (Memishevikj and Hodzhikj, 2010) reported mixed effects. Two studies (García-Gómez et al, 2014; Jenkins et al, 2013) reported no significant benefits. 

The studies on therapeutic horseback riding reported a number of benefits including:  improvements in self-regulation, irritability, lethargy, stereotypic behavior, and hyperactivity, adaptive expressive language skills, motor skills, and verbal praxis/motor planning skills.

The studies on hippotherapy reported a number of benefits including: improved posture, adaptive behaviours, self-care and volition.

At this stage, we cannot determine if any particular group of participants benefited most from any particular form of EAAT.

Status Research

There are a number of limitations to all of the research studies on equine-assisted activities and therapies published to date. 

Type of study

Some studies used relatively weak methodologies or did not adequately describe the methodologies they used. For example

  • Eight of the studies used single-case designs, that is, they did not have a control group of participants who did not receive the intervention.
  • Some of the single case design studies used especially weak methodologies. For example, Keino et al, 2009 used a retrospective case series and Taylor et al, 2009 used a simple ABA design.
  • Five of the controlled group studies (García-Gómez et al, 2014; Gabriels et al, 2012; Harris and Williams, 2017; Lanning et al, 2014; Jenkins et al, 2013) were non-randomised.
  • Some of the randomised controlled studies (such as Steiner and Kertesz, 2015) did not describe the randomisation process. This means that we do not know if the participants in these studies were actually randomised or if they were randomised in an adequate manner.

Participants

Some studies had limited numbers of participants, selected participants in ways that could have biased the outcomes or did not adequately describe the participants or how they were selected. For example

  • Five of the single-case design studies (Ajzenman et al, 2013; Holm et al, 2014; Keino et al, 2009; Memishevikj and Hodzhikj, 2010; Taylor et al, 2009) included six or fewer participants. 
  • Two of the controlled trials (García-Gómez et al, 2014; Jenkins et al, 2013) included fewer than ten participants.
  • One of the studies (Bass et al, 2009) had a very high dropout rate (nine of 34 participants).  
  • Some of the studies included a wide range of participants. For example, Anderson and Meints, 2016 included participants aged from five to sixteen years old.
  • Half of the studies did not independently verify the diagnosis of autism using established tools like the ADOS or ICD-10.  
  • Some of the studies did not provide enough details about the participants (such as the ratio of males to females, their intellectual and verbal abilities, their ethnicity, or whether they had any co-occurring conditions that could have affected the outcomes).

Intervention/s

Some of the researchers delivered the interventions in ways that could have biased the outcomes or did not adequately describe how the interventions were delivered. For example,

  • Some of the studies (such as Ajzenman et al, 2013) did not appear to use a recognised protocol for how the intervention should be delivered and did not provide any information on how well the researchers followed the protocol if they did use one.
  • Some of the studies did not provide enough information about the intervention and how it was delivered, so that other researchers could understand what was being delivered and how. For example, Keino et al (2009), did not provide any information about the frequency and length of the horse riding sessions and Memishevikj and Hodzhikj, 2010 did not state where the horse riding sessions took place.
  • One of the studies (Steiner and Kertesz, 2015) ran for a relatively short period of time (one month) and it is not clear how many sessions actually took place during that month. 
  • Many of the studies included participants who received one or more other interventions (such as speech and language therapy or a medication) at the same time as they received the EAA. The researchers did not always provide details of what those other interventions were. 

Comparators

Some group studies did not compare like with like or did not provide sufficient detail about any differences in the experimental and control groups and the interventions each received. For example,

  • Some of the studies did not provide enough details about the participants in the control group (such as the ratio of males to females, their intellectual and verbal abilities, their ethnicity, or whether they had any co-occurring conditions that could have affected the outcomes).
  • Some of the studies (such as Borgi et al, 2016) included participants in the experimental group who were very different in some respects to the participants in the control group when the study began.
  • Some of the studies did not provide enough details about the intervention received by the control group. For example, García-Gómez et al, 2014 did not state what the control group actually received while Steiner and Kertesz, 2015 stated that the “control group had special pedagogical sessions for autistic children” but did not provide any details about what this involved.
  • Five of the group studies used a wait-list control group (who received nothing) rather than an active control group (who would have received an active intervention of some kind).

Outcomes and Measures

Some researchers did not use the most appropriate outcome measures or did not adequately describe those outcome measures and any limitations they might have had. For example,

  • Four of the studies used only one outcome measure and three of the studies used only two outcome measures.
  • Some of the studies used non-standard, less robust outcome measures. For example, Keino et al, 2009 used the HEIM (Human-equips Interaction on Mental Activity) scale and Taylor et al, 2009 used the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire.
  • None of the studies appeared to use any kind of adverse effect measure.
  • Only two studies (García-Gómez et al, 2014; Lanning et al, 2014) appeared to use a quality of life measure.
  • Only three of the studies (Borg et al, 2016; Gabriels et al, 2015; Kern et al, 2011) used blinded assessors, that is, assessors who did not know which participants received which treatment.
  • The blinded assessors in the study by Gabriels et al, 2015 did not assess the participants against the primary outcome measures (the ABC and VABS).

Data Analysis

Some researchers did not use the most appropriate statistical tools and techniques to analyse the data from their studies or did not adequately describe those tools and techniques and any limitations these may have had.

  • Some of the studies did not appear to use any kind of statistical tools or techniques or, if they did, they used very simplistic ones. For example, Memishevikj and Hodzhikj (2010) simply compared the percentage difference between the baseline and endpoint scores on each item on the ATEC for each participant but without any kind of robust analysis.
  • One of the studies (Steiner and Kertesz, 2015) reported using a range of statistical tools and techniques but failed to adequately explain how these were actually used.
  • Some of the studies did not provide any kind of statistical analysis of the outcomes (such as the statistical significance) and almost none of the studies provided any data on the effect sizes.
  • Most of the studies did not record if EAAT had any beneficial or harmful effects in the medium (three to six months) or longer term (six months or longer).

Other flaws

Some research studies included other flaws that could have biased the outcomes. For example,

  • None of the studies appeared to involve autistic people and parents and carers in the design, development and evaluation of those studies.
  • One of the researchers (Gabriels) has received funding from a range of sponsors (including MARS /WALTHAM and the Human–Animal Bond Research Institute Foundation). This means that she may have been biased towards the intervention, however unconsciously.

For a comprehensive list of potential flaws in research studies, please see Why some autism research studies are flawed

Ongoing Research

We have identified the following studies into equine-assisted activities and therapies that are currently underway.  If you know of any other studies we should include please email info@researchautism.net with the details.

The Sheba Medical Center is running a trial into the efficacy of hippotherapy for children with developmental disabilities. Clinical Trials Gov Ref: NCT00717392. For more details, please see Evaluation of the efficacy of hippotherapy for children with developmental disorders Full Item(Open in New Window)

Future Research

Summary of Existing Research

There is a reasonable amount of research evidence (10 group studies and eight single-case design studies with three or more participants) into the use of equine-assisted activities and therapies for autistic individuals.

This research suggests that therapeutic horseback riding may provide some benefits to some autistic children and young people.  Those benefits include increased social communication and interaction, alongside increased concentration and decreased hyperactivity and irritability. 

There is insufficient evidence to determine if therapeutic horseback riding provides any benefits to autistic adults.

There is insufficient evidence to determine if hippotherapy provides any benefits to autistic individuals.

There is no research to suggest other forms of equine-assisted activities and therapies, such as equine-assisted psychotherapy, provide any benefits to autistic individuals.

Recommendations for Future Research

There is a need for more research into equine-assisted activities and therapies which uses scientifically robust, experimental methodologies with larger numbers of autistic participants.  

That research should 

  • Compare different forms of EAAT including therapeutic horseback riding, hippotherapy and equine-assisted psychotherapy.
  • Compare EAAT with other interventions which are designed to provide the same benefits.
  • Include a wider range of participants including adults and individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds.
  • Identify if specific groups on the autism spectrum are more likely to benefit from specific forms of EEAT than other groups on the spectrum.
  • Identify if EAAT have any beneficial or harmful effects in the medium to long term.
  • Involve autistic people (and parents and carers) in the design, development and evaluation of those studies.

Studies and Trials

This section provides details of scientific studies into the effectiveness of equine-assisted activities and therapies for autistic people which have been published in English-language, peer-reviewed journals.

If you know of any other publications we should list on this page please email info@informationautism.org

Please note that we are unable to supply publications unless we are listed as the publisher. However, if you are a UK resident you may be able to obtain them from your local public library, your college library or direct from the publisher.

Related Studies and Trials


Other Reading

This section provides details of other publications on this topic.

You can find more publications on this topic in our publications database.

If you know of any other publications we should list on this page please email info@informationautism.org

Please note that we are unable to supply publications unless we are listed as the publisher. However, if you are a UK resident you may be able to obtain them from your local public library, your college library or direct from the publisher.

Related Other Reading


Updated
17 Jun 2022
Last Review
01 Dec 2018
Next Review
01 Sep 2024